| Title: |
Overview Document Triad Implementation Guide
|
| Resource Type: |
document --> guidance / decision support
|
| Country: |
USA
|
| Year: |
2007 |
| Availability: |
SCM-3
|
| Author 1/Producer: |
ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council)
|
| Author / Producer Type: |
Agency, regulator or other governmental or inter-governmental body
|
| Publisher: |
ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council)
|
| Publisher City: |
Washington DC, USA
|
| Report / download web link (=direct link): |
http://www.itrcweb.org/Documents/SCM-3.pdf
|
| Format (e.g. PDF): |
PDF
|
| Size: (e.g. 20mb) |
418
|
|
EUGRIS Keyword(s): |
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Conceptual site model
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Initial studies
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Methods
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Sampling and analysis
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Sampling strategy
Contaminated land-->Site investigation-->Site investigation overview
|
| Short description: |
This document was
published by the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
(ITRC). It provides guidance for environmental organizations
that want to implement the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Triad process into their business practices. This document is
intended to complement the first Sampling, Characterization, and
Monitoring Team document, Technical and Regulatory Guidance for
the Triad Approach: A New Paradigm for Environmental Project
Management (ITRC 2003). Although this document is written to
specifically address issues that may be encountered by a state
agency, it should also be helpful to those in other segments of
government and in the private sector. Reasons for implementing
Triad are discussed, as are myths, potential obstacles, and
lessons learned. Challenges and solutions to anticipated issues
are discussed. The appendices include an example of an
organization attempting to establish Triad as an internal
policy. Other appendices include information on legal
defensibility, budget and procurement issues, and acceptability
of data generated via field methods and considerations dealing
with risk assessment (May 2007, 63 pages).
|
|
Submitted By:
|
Professor Paul Bardos WhoDoesWhat?
Last update: 08/06/2007
|
|
|
