| Title: |
Comparison of analytical methods for POPs analysis
|
| Resource Type: |
document --> technical publication --> proceedings / conference paper(s)
|
| Country: |
EU Projects
|
| Year of publication: |
2003 |
| Availability: |
Grabic, R. et al. (2003) Comparison of analytical methods for POPs analysis
|
| Author 1/Producer: |
Grabic, R.
|
| Other Authors/Producers: |
Tomšej, T., Crhová, ?., Chmelová, M., Ocelka, T.
|
| Author / Producer Type: |
EC Project
|
|
EUGRIS Keyword(s): |
Diffuse pollution-->Contaminants-->Persistent Organic Pollutants
|
| Short description: |
The aim of this paper is to compare analytical methods for analysis, especially PCDD/F and PCB, from point of view legislation and accreditation criteria. Two of most important EU standards in field environmental analysis are EN 1948 and Commission Directive 2002/69/EC. Other widely used standards are American US EPA methods 1613, 1668, 8280 and 8290. In general two approaches to analysis such complicated groups of compounds as PCDD/F and PCB are widespread - GC/HRMS or GS/LRMS. Tandem mass spectrometry can be consider a special part of LRMS - more selective and sensitive than quadrupole MS.
|
|
Submitted By:
|
Dr Stefan Gödeke WhoDoesWhat?
Last update: 14/02/2006
|
|
|
