Availability: |
Report in Brief, July 2006
|
Author 1/Producer: |
National Acadamies of Sciences
|
Publisher: |
National Acadamies of Sciences
|
Publisher City: |
Washington DC, USA
|
Short description: |
Extract from Key Findings:
The committee identifi ed three areas that require substantial improvement in describing the scientifi c
basis for EPA’s dioxin risk assessment to support a suffi cient risk characterization:
• Justification of approaches to dose-response modeling for cancer and noncancer end points.
• Transparency and clarity in selection of key data sets for analysis.
• Transparency, thoroughness, and clarity in quantitative uncertainty analysis.
|